"Development as Freedom" Intro
- Amarataya Sen
Amarataya Sen is badass. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for Economics.
Basically he deconstructs the theory that development should be measured by economic development alone. For instance, looking at GDP alone leaves out the advancements that may have been made in education or health care, political and civil rights. He emphasizes the importance of what development brings such as the latter and thus, it should be measured by these things.
He argues that freedom is central to development for 2 reasons: (1) the evaluative reason: assessment of progress has to be done primarily in terms of whether the freedoms that people have are enhanced (2) The effectiveness reason: achievement of development is thoroughly dependent on the free agency of people.
These positive social developments are reliant on economic opportunity. Thus, the development of these freedoms can measure economic development because they are interconnected.
Freedoms are very effective in contributing to economic progress. Thus, the question that some economists ask, "will opportunities to receive basic rights hinder development", is absurd to Sen and he claims his book will deconstruct the idea that restricting freedoms is better for the economy than expanding them.
Argument:
Humans talk unless the freedom is taken away. It is how they interact with the market place. "The freedom to participate in economic interchange has a basic role in social living"(7). There are benefits to market oriented society.
Economic unfreedom can breed social unfreedom <----> social or political unfreedom can also foster economic unfreedom.
5 types of "instrumental freedoms"
(1) political freedoms (2) economic facilities (3) social opportunities (4) transparency guarantees (5) protective security.
These are instrumental because they "advance the general capability of a person" and thus improve development. These freedoms are linked and enhance human freedom in general.
Basically Amaratya Sen believes that we need to rethink the idea of oppressing the labor input of capitalism because by giving them more freedoms they will actually be more productive. I think.
